Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roysters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to KP Snacks. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Roysters

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

CSD was contested/removed. A non-notable snack food. The article (and some of the g-hits I checked) also seem to imply the brand is becoming more difficult to obtain, also showing lack of notability. Matt Deres (talk) 23:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No verifiability. And, for the record, I'm British. --Dweller (talk) 11:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * My apologies. I assumed Twinkle would do every step; I should have double-checked. Matt Deres (talk) 13:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This is a long-standing and irritating occasional bug in Twinkle. Don't worry about it - that's why the Bot exists. --Dweller (talk) 13:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability not established - as above, I'm British too and had to Google just to find out what they were. ~ Excesses ~  (talk) 14:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge to KP Snacks (subsidiary of United Biscuits, subsidiary of Blackstone Group) the makers of Roysters . The Roysters brand received a bit of press coverage for an incident involving a metal shard found in a bag of their chips, but that's probably not enough to justify a stand-alone article.  A redirect is appropriate as this is a plausible search term. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  17:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge per LinguistAtLarge. Seems the best course of action to me. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The redirect option seems best to me now. Should I simply create the redirect now or should I wait for this to run its course first? I'm not familiar with protocol for this situation. Matt Deres (talk) 19:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.