Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ru'la'Lax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Ru'la'Lax
Original fiction - written by Trendon. Interestingly, the only Google hits we get are at trendon.blogspot.com. -- RHaworth 01:55, 1 February 2006 (UTC) --68.198.156.138 04:08, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and it shall return when/if it is published. Ziggurat 02:18, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Patent nonsense. Doesn't even claim to be from / based on a book or... well, anything. Deiz 02:52, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unpublished, not notable. Sounds like it could be interesting fiction, though. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 03:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonsense.  Clearly fiction with no source citation or context. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) [ 22:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC) ]
 * Delete non-notable Prodego  talk  13:31, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable book/ --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 14:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Terence! How can you say such things? It gets two Google hits.  Admittedly both on the author's blog...  Userfy and delete the redirect. I'll do it now and close early if people want? - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] 21:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per everyone.-- Ec5618 22:26, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. &mdash;This user has left wikipedia 19:12 2006-02-05


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.