Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubber Merchant

Rubber Merchant

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was transfer to copyvio process (as a result, permission was granted to use the material). Conscious 16:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Advertisement. Fails to establish notability -- although I'll admit that being around since 1885 is mildly interesting, it's not enough for an article. --Aponar Kestrel (talk) 22:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * This article is a copyvio of, I will flag it as such. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 16:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Not sure how this can be a copyright violation. I wrote the article, I'm an officer of the Company. Our function is somewhat esoteric and there are not a lot of us in the world. Also, the company has been in the para/rubber business from the beginning, in Brazil, and incorporated in New York in 1885. Thus historical, unusual business and interesting international trader.
 * In that case, delete as vanity. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 01:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.