Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubber dam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   '''Revert to DAB status. .  MBisanz ''' talk 01:32, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Rubber dam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Duplicate content exists at inflatable rubber dam. Additionally, this article provides no citations or internal links, and is virtually unreadable. It should be removed or merged into inflatable rubber dam if it contains valuable content.  —Entropy (T/C) 23:07, 14 November 2012 (UTC)


 * delete with merge of anything useful, per nom. This article looks to be more about promoting one maker than on an encyclopedic explanation of the principles. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:37, 15 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Revert to dab page as before 22 July 2012. Any new content about inflatable rubber dams belongs in that existing article, and should not have been placed overwriting the dab page. I'll add a hatnote for now. Pam  D  16:50, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Revert to disambiguation per PamD (thanks for checking the history!). -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.