Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruben Dante


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G11, advertisement for the person.  DGG ( talk ) 06:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Ruben Dante

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Good faith google search is not finding references to show this person is notable. References in the article are primary sources or very general (links to home pages of organizations). Can't find a reference to support "Chairman of New Media" at SAG AFTRA (or even find if that's a notable position). Article has been created multiple times at Ruben Dante and Ruben Landon Dante.

If kept, this article needs a serious re-write to avoid promotional tone. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  00:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

I just came across this, "Ruben Dante" I just made a page for, I didn't realize this one existed, however He goes by his First middle and last name, Ruben Landon Dante, thats probably why there is two. The fact that he was chairmen of new media at SAG wouldn't be listed on the New SAGAFTRA website, we talked about this when I initially interviewed him for a book, the reason being is that SAG has merged with AFTRA and archived information simply isn't something they keep in the website however it has been independently verified by IMDb, weather its a notable position, well yes 2011 was when Netflix and Hulu where seeing huge growth without precedent, kind of why that position was particularly important at the time. I just wrote what seems to be mostly common knowledge except for the Options Table so it doubt it would sound promotional in anyway there is nothing suggested or hinting at where or not anything he is saying or doing is a good or bad thing, maybe even seeming more bad than good as his position in new media was quite fiscally conservative and the union wasn't too happy about it nor where the actors. You can surely delete this article and mine, but he has been referenced a bit especially lately so odds are they will keep popping up. Furthermore there are far less notable people, especially as actors that are listed in Wikipedia with little to no serious mainstream credibility at all, If Nothing else he was on the Disney Channel for some time as well as Feature Films. His entertainment company has more than enough articles on its own from various magazines and Amazon's IMDb itself, Not to mention the Hollywood Reporter, Hollywood Advocate, As I've been looking around, it seems less and less publications archive anything online to reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DenniseShull (talk • contribs) 04:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can't find any secondary references to him as an individual save for IMDb, whose information has apparently been written by the PR department of his company. In addition to there being no reference of his position at the SAG I am skeptical that being what seems to be a middle manager with no lasting impact reaches the threshold of notability anyway.  The major claim to notability seems to be his founding of a website called All Things Hollywood, but secondary coverage of that company is lacking as well... C628 (talk) 04:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

That is Actually incorrect, he is not Most Prominently known for his "All Things Hollywood" he is most knows as a trader, and is Most referenced as a Financial Figure NOT ATH, that is just how he got his footing, The only thing anyone related to Ruben Landon Dante had to do with his IMDb is his Biography as it had been continuously inaccurate, he has no control over anything else on that page, if you don't believe that, go try to edit someone's page on there. He is Hardly or At all involved with All Things Hollywood or as an actor anymore, thus I Don't see why anyone on his team would be invested in trying to give him any Notice in that regard, when I made the page I intended it to be more for college students researching money managers in mind not really Hollywood Types. DenniseShull (talk) 04:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DenniseShull (talk • contribs) 04:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

He was an Actor On Major Cable and Film, not a "Middle Manager" I'm not sure what c628 meant by that, in fact I don't believe he ever did or does anything in a middle management position given that he seems to be a big proponent of "Direct Access" everything especially in trading an investing.DenniseShull (talk) 04:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.