Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubens Gerchman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was a non-admin keep with no deletion rationale and consensus for keep. SorryGuy Talk  01:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Rubens Gerchman

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't think this article is in good shape so thats why i request a deletion. Unless someone fixes the article then it would be a keep.--Pookeo9 (talk) 20:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep first, the article is not in such a terrible state and second, when an article sucks, we don't delete it, we fix it. There's an article in the Portuguese wiki which you can request to have translated or adapted, you can ask for help from various WikiProjects, you can also go to your favorite library and pick up additional references to build the article. But he appears to be a significant figure and the article should stay. 66.130.247.219 (talk) 22:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The deletion argument presented is not grounds for deletion. Keep, under WP:ATD, If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion. . Yng  varr  22:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, article came with two reliable sources indicating notability. We don't delete imperfect articles, we improve them. --Dhartung | Talk 00:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 20:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes, this needs clean-up. However, he exhibited at Museum of Modern Art in São Paulo, Museu da Republica in Rio de Janeiro, Austin Museum in Austin, Texas, Bronx Museum and 3 São Paulo Biennials. This is more than notable.  freshacconci  speak to me  17:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep seems like a notable entry. - Modernist (talk) 18:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.