Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubik's V Cube


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rubik's Cube. Clear consensus that this should not be kept, but a valid redirect target was found. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Rubik&

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:FORK of articles on the various V Cube models, rightly tagged for WP:POV problems (it's essentially an attack). Even if all models were rolled into one article, it wouldn't be this misnamed thing. Mangoe (talk) 02:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:POV duplicate of V-Cube 6 and V-Cube 7, with rather significant chunks of text copied across. The most prominent part not copied is claiming Verdes was called "cruel" and accused use of "patent loopholes", which without reliable sources is akin to straight-up attack.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 03:36, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:36, 17 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rubik's Cube. Would say merge, but present content is unsuitable OR and ranting. Pax 09:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.