Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rublix (website)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 22:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Rublix (website)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no substantial references for notability except an advertorial, presenting the company as if nobody had heard of the technology before  DGG ( talk ) 20:21, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Nothing in the way of sources whatsoever. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Contrary to the article, I do not think this is a popular cryptocurrency. Ifnord (talk) 19:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.