Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruby Cup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Ruby Cup

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spam for the company linked to in the only external link. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It is not spam. I think the promotional content needs to be reduced, yes; the article however also gives general information about the situation in Kenya where the company is trying to help women with menstrual hygiene difficulties. I did notice a potential conflict of interest though regarding one of the editors (with user name "rubycup") - please see talk page of the article when it is undeleted. I guess the main problem is that there are not sufficient secondary sources about ruby cup yet - right? EvMsmile (talk) 10:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, or perhaps merge a small amount of content to menstrual cup with a redirect, if there's an avenue for that there. However I don't think this company meets WP:GNG based on the lack of reliable independent sources. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.