Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudi Mahmutaj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Rudi Mahmutaj

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Mahmutaj never played in a professional league and the coverage to date isn't enough for WP:SIGCOV, in my view. Panorama 1 is just an announcement of being released, Panorama 2 is just a direct quote from Mahmutaj with no third party analysis and Sport Ekspres represents the best source on him but it still only confirms that he scored 19 goals for Luftëtari and played at under-17 level for Albania, which I would say falls just short of the depth required. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Albania.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:30, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment – I was wondering... Since interview sources fail WP:GNG, do ones with third-party analysis count to demonstrate the person's notability? If so, what are some examples from websites? ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ   Clara A. Djalim   ໒꒱˚｡⋆  14:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * This interview is an example of one that would count as having at least some third party analysis (of the tennis player Carlos Alcaraz). I am aware that that's a different sport, though. Good interview sources for football look like The Guardian (Leah Williamson interview) and BBC (Aitana Bonmatí interview). Notice how the articles are written outside of a normal Q&A format and how most of them start with some background info on the interviewee first, which automatically pushes it to SIGCOV. The articles do more than just merely regurgitate the interview. If someone can find similar calibre sourcing for Mahmutaj, I will happily withdraw my support for deletion.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 15:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 19:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.