Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudolf Robert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Rudolf Robert

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable based on the Wikipedia Notability guidelines. CPost1 (talk) 12:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep: The refs in the article establish notability. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * How do these references establish notability? To me these sources seem to reinforce the idea of "trivial mention" of his contribution as described in the General Notability Guildline under the subsection "Significant coverage."CPost1 (talk) 15:45, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - the GNG threshold has been met from the sources already in the article. I'd suggest that the nominator brush up on the GNG before nominating another article for deletion. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I read the GNG before nominating this for deletion. This article and its sources establish the subject as a person who:


 * 1) Was in the Holocaust, and not all Holocaust victims are notable.
 * 2) Was one of many gabbai in the Jewish Community of Berlin. There are fourteen others in the referenced list. This does not necessarily establish the subjects notability.
 * 3) Gave testimony at the Nuremberg trials. Does this alone establish notability of this person and warrant a stand-alone page for him, or would noting his contribution in the "Overview of the Trails" section of the Nuremberg Trials page be more appropriate? The People Notable for Only One Event Section of the Wikipedia Notablity page is where my argument for deletion of this page is coming from. Specifically this section: "the degree of significance of the event itself and the degree of significance of the individual's role within it should be considered. The general rule in many cases is to cover the event, not the person."  CPost1 (talk) 15:45, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.