Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudopoly (game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedily deleted by Andrevan. RasputinAXP  c  23:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Rudopoly (game)
Pure hoax. The article states that there is a culture of secrecy surrounding the game. So secret in fact that Google has never heard of it. -- RHaworth 22:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * delete is it maybe nonsensical enough to be speedy? This part is especially ridiculous: "Although the game certainly gained popularity in the 1970s, and most believe it did not exist before then, there exists evidence that it dates back to ancient times. One collector claims to own a Chinese rule set from the 2nd century BC, whilst other sources suggest that World War Two was actually entirely caused by Adolf Hitler attempting to play a game of Rudopoly; using the Earth and its inhabitants instead of the official board and pieces." JoshuaZ 22:11, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * deleteit is nonsence Whopper 22:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - patent nonsense. - Richardcavell 23:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Patent nonsense; hoax; probably something made up at school one afternoon.  Bucketsofg✐ 00:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, but not speedy under how I've seen admins handle the "patent nonsense" speedy-delete criterion. A claim (utterly spurious) of notability is at least implied.  My official delete reason is lack of verifiability, a core policy, but the WP:NFT essay also seems to apply.  Barno 01:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT, WP:V, and so on. Not patent nonsense. Stifle (talk) 14:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Bart133 19:52, 19 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.