Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudrabhayananda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 00:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Rudrabhayananda

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Bio of a non-notable guru with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 23:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Namaskar Dear friend you have read clearly he never learned from people who were dead, rather his father had and such Guru's did exist 50 years back. He is not a non existant Guru rather he is known to many and he is known on youtube also —Preceding unsigned comment added by RASMIGUPTA (talk • contribs) 08:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 23:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 23:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 23:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No notability, no reliable sources. Subject listed as learning from Gurus who had died prior to birth. Guess he reads a lot? -Vritti (talk) 03:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probably exists, but has done nothing notable. Anyone can make up a philospohy and teach it, but until multiple independant reliable sources take note of them, they do not need an encyclopedia article.Yobmod (talk) 12:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO/WP:GNG. The only half-credible source is the personality interview in The Hindu newspaper's regional supplement, which makes extremely credulous and dubious claims ("translate the 5000-year-old vigyan tantra scripture into English, available only in Sanskrit so far."). He seems to have published some books on fringe subjects, but the publishers are non-reputed AFAIK and no one seems to have independently reviewed any of the books. Apart from that, the internet guru's reputation seems to rest on youtube videos, blogs etc, which fail the multiple reliable secondary sources requirements. Abecedare (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.