Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudy Poat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:21, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Rudy Poat

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Terrible references. No coverage at all apart from single interview. UPE   scope_creep Talk  09:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Technology, Netherlands,  and New York.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Available coverage consists of passing mentions regarding his involvement in The Matrix and an interview in Game Developer. No awards or other major contributions that would fulfill notability for creative professionals. Mooonswimmer 13:31, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I am sure we could find more references, but he led the special effects team on the first The Matrix movie which I thought was amazing and notable. Stravensky (talk) 22:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Unless there is WP:SECONDARY coverage, people talking to other people about the subject but who don't know the subject. That is gold standard. So in this case, no. The subject fails WP:BIO. There is zero coverage, not even enought to reach WP:THREE which by consensus is considered best practice, to prove the person notable.    scope_creep Talk  09:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - I can find mentions confirming credits, but nothing that amounts to significant coverage. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.