Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudy filippini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete, but deleting admin forgot to close. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 07:25, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Rudy filippini
This article is a hoax. Delete Golfcam 01:27, 25 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - hoax, the "lack of bearded clam" is the first giveaway. Endomion 01:31, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - bad hoax. Drmandrake 05:30, 25 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete ludicrous. --MisterHand 06:24, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. --Joel7687 08:53, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Hoax. Are people just inserting random nonsense here to see how long it lasts? --Wingsandsword 08:59, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as hoax --Quarl 10:56, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as a hoax. There is not a provision under CSD for speedy deletion of hoaxes.  Movementarian 14:22, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * There is a CSD for patent nonsense however, which this clearly is. --MisterHand 15:03, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * CSD G1: "Patent nonsense, i.e. no meaningful content, unsalvageably incoherent page. This does not include: poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, badly translated material, implausible theories or hoaxes." I don't think this qualifies as patent nonsense either, if I am interpreting CSD G1 correctly.  Movementarian 15:11, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN JDoorjam 16:36, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Please enter votes that make sense to others unfamiliar with your acronyms.--Aleron235 16:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Added wikilink to help with the confusion. Movementarian 17:07, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * :: ahem :: "Bad Jokes And Other Deleted Nonsense" -- that is, exile it to BJAODN, the Elba of Wiki hoaxes. JDoorjam 17:08, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * with due respect, Aleron235, BJAODN is mentioned near the top of Articles for deletion as one of the accepted options for deletion nominations.  BL   kiss the lizard  02:00, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete.--Aleron235 16:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Definitely ridiculous.-- Violin  G  irl ♪ 18:42, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. This must be made up... all of it... Zookman12 19:37, 25 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.