Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rue des prairies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 08:10, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Rue des prairies

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE.

PROD removed with "Deprodding; not clear that reviews for a 1959 film are going to be readily accessible online; the existing source strongly suggests notability & everyone working on it is blue-linked; deserves at least an AfD so that a proper search for sources can be attempted" Donald D23   talk to me  23:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and France.  Donald D23   talk to me  23:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment It might be worth checking out some of the other language Wikipedias that has this article. It seems to go by various names, eg, Mio Figlio, Rue De Paris, Wiesenstraße Nr. 10. Some possible articles online that may lead to notability? Le Paris populaire des années 50 dans Rues des Prairies, https://www.memoiresdeguerre.com/2016/07/rue-des-prairies.html, https://www.film-rezensionen.de/2021/06/wiesenstrasse-nr-10/, https://archive.org/details/guidedesfilms0000tula/page/665/mode/1up?q=%22RUE+DES+PRAIRIES%22, http://www.frenchfilms.org/review/rue-des-prairies-1959.html Piecesofuk (talk) 14:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete the French article looks like an imdb listing and has much OR. The sources it uses are a government film listing website youtube film history "documentary" and a tv guide-type site. The rest is either a plot summary or unsourced text from who knows where. Oaktree b (talk) 03:54, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * We are discussing the existence of the English Wikipedia article, not the French one, and it has (and had well before you made that comment) a source published by Manchester University Press. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:13, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, if the FR article had better sourcing, it would help show notability. In this case it doesn't. Oaktree b (talk) 15:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is sourced as good or as bad as most articles on films of the 1950s. It seems arbitrary to delete this one.Inwind (talk) 00:27, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFF. Just because other pages with similar content exists does not mean this one should. If anyone comes across these other pages they very well make a decision to delete them. But their current existence has no bearing on the deletion discussion for this film. I did not propose this article because of its current content, but because I could find no reviews or other items to meet notability requirements. The citations listed above by user Piecesofuk all appear to be blog sites, so they don't seem to help. Donald D23   talk to me  21:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * This source, at least, appears to be reliable and independent, being a book published by Éditions Robert Laffont. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:06, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Review from Le Monde; more recent review from Causeur. It's listed in Larousse's Dictionnaire mondial des films, plus, as Phil Bridger noted, the Tulard book mentioned above. An academic study that uses Rue des Prairies as part of its analysis of depictions of Parisian banlieues in French cinema of the day. The article needs expansion, but it appears to meet WP:NFILM. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * An additional (more recent) review from Paris Fait Son Cinéma ... — Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion such as reviews from Le Monde and Causeur and others as well as book coverage so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view Atlantic306 (talk) 19:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.