Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rufat Abbasov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Rufat Abbasov

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Stats stub on a footballer with only 160 mins of professional league football to date. My search of Azerbaijani sources didn't yield any evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. At first glance, Sportline looks decent but it's, in fact, almost 100% quote content so doesn't actually contain any independent analysis of Abbasov. Baku Plus was just two passing mentions in a match summary on a reserve fixture. If he becomes notable later, this can always be recreated but we shouldn't be writing articles on footballers that haven't reached that level yet. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Azerbaijan.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 15:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Draftify – WP:TOOSOON. Svartner (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO. Source in article is a database record, as noted above the interview fails WP:IS, BEFORE found name mentions/listings, but nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk  02:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.