Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby AM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone  15:53, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Rugby AM

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced article about a television series produced by and aired on a single local television station in a single media market. WP:NMEDIA only grants a presumption of notability to nationally-distributed series, not to local ones — and the lack of sourcing means that this doesn't get to claim a WP:GNG pass in lieu of failing NMEDIA. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:37, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:45, 29 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Maybe delete as my searches found nothing particularly good aside from this. SwisterTwister   talk  06:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   06:14, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 13:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - No assertion of notability, not to mention the lack of sources as well. Clearly does not pass the general notability guidelines.  Aerospeed  (Talk) 13:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches showed nothing to meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.