Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby League Live 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Wily D  14:01, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Rugby League Live 2

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The article is unsourced, and I couldn't find any sources about this game online that would indicate it passes Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Until the game is released and covered in secondary sources, it is probably too soon for Wikipedia to have an article on it. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 11:41, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:59, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:59, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Rugby League Live where it is mentioned as a sequal. No independent notability yet. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge fully back into the prior game's article. It seems silly to delete this only to have to recreate it after a month or two. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree that this will probably be notable when it is released. However, that might be longer than a couple of months away - from what I read, it was slated for release at some unspecified time in 2012, and there is always the possibility it may be delayed. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 15:01, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I see your point, but we're already more than halfway into 2012 and so there's only so much further it can be released. I do agree that if it's cancelled or more substantially delayed (say, to 2013) then action should be taken.  Remember, it doesn't take an AFD to merge something, it could simply be merged into the other article until reviews and such start surfacing. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:36, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge as not yet notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment According to a large NZ online retailer, Mighty Ape, the estimated release date is 31 August and they are already taking pre-orders. Mattlore (talk) 03:27, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment In Australia, EB Games are also taking pre-orders for a 2012 release. 60.240.243.216 (talk) 11:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * First stores often use placeholder dates so the EB Games listing does not prove that the game will be released this year. Second, even if that is the case we still do not have significant coverage of this game to warrant a separate article yet so it should be merged at this point. As the games release date gets closer there will likely be previews and analysis from reliable sources and the article can be recreated at that point.--174.93.167.177 (talk) 21:21, 10 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep I have added six sources to the article, and there are many games that haven't been released or just announced, that have their own Wikipedia pages. The Game Muster (Talk) 4:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - The sources added aren't of the best quality. One is from Facebook, and at least 2 are merely game announcement sources. Not sure how reliable "Zo Knows Gaming" and some of these sources are... Sergecross73   msg me   13:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep following The Game Muster's revamp of the article. Mattlore (talk) 08:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.