Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby union in Bermuda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bermuda Rugby Football Union. Bermuda Rugby Football Union seems to be the most natural target. Randykitty (talk) 16:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Rugby union in Bermuda

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is about an under-developed topic and mostly contains information about Bermuda national rugby union team, information about Bermuda Rugby Football Union, or vague general statements. — MarkH21 (talk) 03:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21 (talk) 03:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21 (talk) 03:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21 (talk) 03:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Bermuda national rugby union team. Standard title that people would search for, and until there's enough content to justify a summary article, it is useful to have it point to the national team page. Wug·a·po·des​ 23:15, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:26, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Nominator comment: A redirect would be fine, but it's not clear to me whether Bermuda Rugby Football Union or Bermuda national rugby union team would be a more natural target. The latter article is more developed while the topic of the former is more broad in scope. — MarkH21 (talk) 07:16, 20 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.