Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruger Bisley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. L Faraone  22:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Ruger Bisley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The Bisley is not a firearm model, but the name for a grip variant, which is found in various other ruger models like the blackhawk and vaquero. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenbirdman (talk • contribs) 00:56, 26 April 2013 ‎(UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 26.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  02:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment The article doesn't claim that the Bisley is a firearm model: "The Ruger Bisley [...] comes in a variety of different finishes, calibers, and barrel lengths." Dricherby (talk) 22:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or possible merge into Ruger Blackhawk and Ruger Vaquero; according to Ruger, the Bisley has a distinct model number (2 in fact) without counting the Bisley Vaquero. The hammer is different on a Bisley as well.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 21:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  02:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran ( t  •  c ) 02:55, 10 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep as a distinct line of models with sufficent sourcing to establish notability. - The Bushranger One ping only 17:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.