Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugrats in Australia: The Movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Rugrats in Australia: The Movie

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable (GHits literally doesn't return anything on this title). WP:NFF. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb  03:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Like the nominator, I literally could not find any evidence this film exists. Looks like a severe case of WP:CRYSTAL. -- Lord  Pistachio  talk 06:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for now fails WP:CRYSTAL, no IMDb page, not enough sources. Recreate when enough sources are found. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:15, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This is not from an SPA, but I'm not sure where in the world the article's creator would have gotten any facts, let alone in this amount of detail. Mandsford 18:54, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Yet more Nickcruft from somebody who doesn't know anything about the movie business. This would have been announced years ago, and studios which specialize in hand-drawn animation would probably cut off an arm before they ever let a CGI director lead a hand-drawn project. And in the end, "The voice actors of the film are the same"? Can we get a lazier hoax?  Nate  • ( chatter ) 22:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete-Seeing how Rugrats was cancelled a few years back and that I was surprised that they may be making a 4th movie plus no confirmation from any offical source means this is just a rumour. —Preceding unsigned comment added by S73W1E6R1FF1N (talk • contribs) 23:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as clear and obvious hoax. Cannonbolt2 (talk) 11:54, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm reluctant to use the "h-word" on someone who has been a contributor here for six months and made hundreds of edits. However, it is clear that there are no reliable sources to support any rumors that may have been bandied about on discussion boards, and that the article should not have been written in the first place.  Mandsford 13:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per TOOSOON. While I find enough hints online to not call it an outright hoax, it definitely fails criteria of WP:N and WP:NF.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Crystal and WP:NFF.  I didn't even know Rugrats was still on or active?  I thought it was All Grown Up that now airs.  Hmm.   Mike   Allen  04:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Even All Grown Up! is no longer active (nor is any other Rugrats spin-off). I stand by my hoax claim, but in fairness, the article creator may have fallen for the hoax, rather than actually starting it. Cannonbolt2 (talk) 12:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Well.. there you go. I think this will be snow deleted anyway.  Mike   Allen  06:51, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I am sure this is a hoax. Even with AGF, the creator of the article has made dubious edits before. BOVINEBOY 2008 ) 19:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.