Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rukma Roy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Rukma Roy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lack of references that is why the creator is using Ott link, hotstar link, and trying to prove that the person is notable.Parthhalder (talk) 10:36, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Parthhalder (talk) 10:36, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep the nominator has proceeded without WP:BEFORE. The person clearly passes WP:ENT and WP:GNG verified by WP:RS listed in the article itself. I am neither connected nor subject to WP:COI or WP:UPE. I have decided to create and expand redirects only I found them to be notable enough. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 13:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * keep. Passes GNG - e.g. the Times of India refs. --Tagishsimon (talk) 15:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Covered in several secondary sourced.--Ipigott (talk) 07:53, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The secondary source references seem abundant. Innisfree987 (talk) 10:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * KEEP The subject has a lot of secondary sources, passes WP:GNG also passes WP:NACTOR. Bengal Boy (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:42, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.