Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rules and regulations for God-heads (Ayyavazhi) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:46, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Rules and regulations for God-heads (Ayyavazhi)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The unreferenced article with no inline citations related to the Ayyavazhi faith narrates "Rules and regulations for God-heads (Ayyavazhi)". I tried googling it to find mention in neutral references for notability, however have failed to find them - most of the search results are wiki-mirrors. Redtigerxyz Talk 14:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mythology, Religion, Hinduism,  and India.  Redtigerxyz  Talk 14:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


 * This is a mythology related article based on Ayyavazhi Mythology. This event is elobrated in Akilathirattu Ammanai, the holy book of Ayyavazhi. More over the event is well elaborated in the books which are mentioned in the reference section. Also there are no different views over the same event for different authors. So no inline citations are needed repeatedly. - Vaikunda Raja    :talk:   07:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Delete Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Religious esoterica that has, from what I can see, attracted very little attention from people outside the sect makes it impossible for any article on the topic to be written from a neutral perspective. Hemantha (talk) 18:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per Hemantha. There's nothing worth merging either, unfortunately. Ovinus (talk) 02:07, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.