Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rules of Enragement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was keep. Jaranda wat's sup 21:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Rules of Enragement
The page starts out: Rules of Enragement is Black's third CD. (Then there is a list of tracks.} Don't know who Black is as the wikipedia link is invalid -- was it deleted? KarenAnn 17:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This is comedian Lewis Black's CD. Wildthing61476 18:07, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete none of his other albums have their own articles, including one that earned a Grammy nomination. I don't see how this will ever be more than a track list. --djrobgordon 18:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * keep I cleaned it up to be more like the thousands of other individual CD pages that we have. Lewis Black is certainly notable enough, and I don't see what's wrong with having an article that is never much more than a track list. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 19:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable release by a notable recording artist/comedian. Given Black's political leanings, more could be written about the album than just the tracklist. hateless 20:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per cleaned up, and it's quite notable indeed. Themindset 20:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep My vote might be a bit biased: I literally just saw this and went, "WHAAAAAAAA?!?!" I was listening to this CD today. Like, literally, not more than two hours ago. But anyway, the artist/comedian is absolutely notable, and for stand-up albums, his are quite popular. I'd like to see it expanded, but it's absoultely a keeper. -- Kicking222 22:24, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Extremely in need of expansion, but it's definitely notable. -- Northenglish (talk) -- 22:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.