Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rules of the Internet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. DS 03:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Rules of the Internet
This seems awfully close to original research. "Rule 1" has only 250 Google hits. "3" has no Google hits except this page. Ditto for "78" (barring a page quoting this page). "34" has only 80 Google hits. The stuff on this page is for the most part non-notable memes that are a very, very long way from qualifying as "rules of the Internet". — Hex    (❝  ?!  ❞)   00:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, lacks notability and verifiability. Deltabeignet 01:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, is pretty much a collection of things that sound like a rule and that have to do with the internet. Recury 02:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, random collocation of summaries of articles that already exist about internet related practices. SM247 My Talk  02:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above.  WC  Quidditch  &#9742;   &#9998;  03:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. TheRingess 04:44, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:V and WP:MEME. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per SM247. -- 9  cds (talk) 06:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly original research: This article is a list of notable proposed "rules of the Internet". The mentioned "laws" are notable, but this collection of them is original research. —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-02 09:25Z 
 * Delete Given the content, I wouldn't be at all surprised if this was just an eleborate attempt to sneak a link to a cartoon into WP by disguising it as an article. In other words, the rest of the "rules" might be filler for #34.  Delete in any case. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  11:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, looks like original research, few references. Brian 12:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)btball
 * Delete, lacks notability and verifiability. -- Alias Flood 16:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. --Tachyon01 18:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks notability and unverifiable. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  18:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As per above -- Ood 22:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Zos 23:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.