Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rum & Coke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Rum &amp; Coke
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of notability; no references for over a year. Not much content here, either. Powers T 14:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * comment On the first two pages of a google search I found four reviews, including one by the BBC and another by the Independent On Sunday . I've added these as references. Edgepedia (talk) 15:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. There's an expectation that alternatives to deletion will be sought before bringing an article here (see WP:BEFORE). Although the article is currently poor, there is plenty of scope for improvement given readily available sources: BBC, The Independent, contactmusic.com, The List, plus non-Enlish sources such as this. The band is certainly notable and there is sufficient independent coverage to justify an article.--Michig (talk) 15:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've added the infobox, moved all but one external links into the review section, so it should look even nicer now. --Ezhuks (talk) 20:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep – I've added credits and a bit of composition and reception, but even if there are no sources other than the ones I have used, there is a lot more info to flesh out. Adabow (talk · contribs) 02:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.