Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rummel Creek Elementary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Rummel Creek Elementary School . Closing early as nn schools are redirected and the nom seems in favour of redirecting so shall do just that, If anyone wants it merged they can discuss it on the TP (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 03:12, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Whoops that should've been "Spring Branch Independent School District" - Not sure what the hell happened there!, Thanks for spotting the cock up!. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Rummel Creek Elementary School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm having trouble finding decent sources to establish notability and verifiability of the article's content (someone tagged it for OR). I'm thinking that the article should be redirected to or merged with Spring Branch Independent School District, but I feel more input is needed before any action is taken. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 06:43, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 06:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 06:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect per nom. Most elementary schools do not warrant articles of their own; usually they get redirected to the school district or a similar page. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to school district per longstanding consensus at AfD that all but the most exceptional elementary schools are non-notable. Carrite (talk) 20:49, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.