Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RumoursofthedeathofSaddamHussein

No need for rumours in wikipedia.


 * Keep - interesting Bensaccount 02:05, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Everyking 03:07, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good article. Actually, unless someone cares to sign this listing it can be removed anyway, unsigned VfD votes don't count and neither should unsigned listings. But move the discussion to the article's talk page, because we need to make the point that there's a difference between spreading rumours and reporting rumours. This article clearly reports the rumours which were a very interesting part of this sad story. As such it is factual, and belongs here. Andrewa 17:47, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good article now. Will probably be even more interesting in a few years. Andrewa's justifications apply. Dpbsmith 22:57, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with Andrew: Remove from VfD. Cribcage 06:57, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep - living history - T&#949;x &#964; ur&#949; 15:42, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Rumours though they may have been, they were widely reported at the time, and deserve a venue for debunking. &mdash;Psychonaut 15:44, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. BL 07:33, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)