Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Run (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   "Result was KEEP per WP:SNOW.  Non admin closure" Jclemens (talk) 21:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Run (novel)
delete not at all notable. Imnotacoolguy (talk) 05:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The novel is written by an award-winning novelist and listed as a New York Times bestseller. Both of which are statements that are adequately referenced and make a solid claim for inclusion. - Mgm|(talk) 07:59, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - subject to substantial independent reporting, meeting WP:N thusly. Wily D 11:04, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: There is no way that this article is going to get deleted. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 12:44, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I also added a Houston Chronicle review. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 12:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I also found a Post-Gazette review. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 12:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I also found a Guardian review. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 12:54, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I also found a The Independent review. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 12:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * And a The Times review. It does work because I viewed it today. Do a Google search for the link. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 12:59, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Sounds pretty awful, frankly, but it's a bestseller and passes our book guidelines easily. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Pretty obvious keep. Fumoses (talk) 13:40, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as per everyone but the nominator. Edward321 (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Badly written article about a book I would not want to read, if the article describes it accurately. Seems to have several substantial reviews. Edison (talk) 16:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.