Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runamuck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. This has been on AfD for a month, with 2 relists, so a third relist seems pointless. I'm calling this NC, with no prejudice if somebody wants to nominate it again. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Runamuck

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This does not establish notability independent of Transformers through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. I am also nominating these character articles with the same issues
 * TTN (talk) 16:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 16:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * TTN (talk) 16:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 16:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge Runamuck, Scorponok, and Swindle into List of Decepticons. BOZ (talk) 16:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 09:30, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep or merge because we don't delete all the Transformers articles because they are sometimes notable. JJ98 (Talk) 10:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.