Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runaway (Cabot novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Meg Cabot. I didn't redirect to the Airhead trilogy section because all that section is is the three book titles and nothing else. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:56, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Runaway (Cabot novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Substub about the third book in a series with no assertion of notability. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 23:29, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment A quick google search gave me this: http://www.thestorysiren.com/2010/05/runaway-by-meg-cabot.html ; this: http://www.amazon.com/Runaway-Airhead-Meg-Cabot/dp/0545040604 ; this: http://www.greenbeanteenqueen.com/2010/04/runaway-airhead-novel-by-meg-cabot-plus.html ; http://sites.google.com/site/parentalbookreviews/shadow/content-review-runaway-airhead-by-meg-cabot and many other (mostly unofficial) reviews. The book definitely doesn't seem to have gone unnoticed, but admittedly the article does not contain much useful in its current form, so I remain neutral. DubZog (talk) 23:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Book reviews don't necessarily make something notable, though. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 08:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Not necessarily, but the multiplicity of them may be something to consider in this case... DubZog (talk) 09:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: I've removed the plot description.  It's copied from the press blurb from the publisher which shows up at book selling sites like Barnes and Noble. -- Whpq (talk) 17:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  01:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Meg Cabot. It looks to be a popular series, but this book is only recently released.  When it gets review of out notable publications, then the article can be created.  With the copyvio removed, there is nothing to merge. -- Whpq (talk) 17:58, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Whpq, until someone actually feels like writing some non-copyvio, sourced content for it. Jclemens (talk) 19:49, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect per Whpq; recent book, unsourced article. Ryan Norton 01:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect -  then Recreate Yes, it most likely will be notable, but it's too new for an article right now. ~ Qwerp Qwertus ·  Contact Me  · 05:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.