Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RuneScape news


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 04:27, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

RuneScape news
While RuneScape is notable, not every website associated with it is, especially one described by an article full of gamecruft. &mdash;Wrathchild (talk) 22:12, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * look there and you can instantly speedy it. J.J.Sagnella 22:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Wait, why does that link make it speedy-able? -- Rory 0 96 00:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Because this article is just a copy of something we already have in RuneScape Portal. J.J.Sagnella 07:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Your link clearly says that this article is more expansive. -- Rory 0 96 07:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Recently got chnaged. ;-) J.J.Sagnella 16:29, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Anyways I say delete as if it can't be put in the link I shown they can just look at it through the real runescape webpage. In fact this could be a copyvio. J.J.Sagnella 16:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't agree with the original reason for deletion (fancruft), as that is not a good enough reason for deletion, and that's the lame excuse that almost got the whole series deleted. But this article is unecessary, especially since we have it in the portal.  So I say delete.Dtm142 17:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.