Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runes of Mystery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that GNG is not met Nosebagbear (talk) 11:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Runes of Mystery

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non-notable game with no notable company involved in its production. Has no significant mentions or even notable reviews. Daiyusha (talk) 08:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  10:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  10:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, I cannot find any coverage in reliable sources. The article was claiming that it had seen "mixed reviews" according to Metacritic, but this was a total fabrication - the MC page has zero reviews listed.--AlexandraIDV 13:12, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A WP:BEFORE searched showed no reliable sources, not even in Turkish. As said above, MC has only one user review, and that is from the developers. The references link given by the creator of the article is this, it has no sources, only links that come up are to play it online. ~Styyx   Talk? ^-^  14:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello official site related music distribution and google information page is available. If you see it as worthless, I can't tell him anything but the subject is not made up. Please have some respect.Aslı Kırar (talk) 16:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Its not about having a google info page. Wikipedia needs all articles to meet at least WP:GNG. In your case, It could be having the game being published by a notable company, having news articles written about the game, being reviewed by critics on reliable sites like IGN or Metacritic. Unfortunately, your game doesn't stand out. Daiyusha (talk) 16:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - this fails WP:GNG; no reviews, no independent media coverage as far as I can see Spiderone  17:35, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

@Daiyusha It is a very good explanation. Thank you. Aslı Kırar (talk) 22:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete no independent reliable sources from what I can tell. Does not meet the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.