Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runescape Community


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Runescape Community
Delete. Although Runescape Community seems to be a major site, it would be a bit of a stretch to include anything more than the current contents of the stub. It also failed to be included in the "External links" section of RuneScape - and none of the sites listed in the external links section of RuneScape have their own articles. It would be more logical to debate the addition of RuneScape Community to RuneScape's external links than simply create an article that will always remain a stub. Someone42 15:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and add link to RuneScape, per nom. Powers 15:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It was decided for only 5 links to be on RuneScape as it got too large, but this was not one of them. So this doesn't deserve a mention on the article, so definitely fails to get its own article. J.J.Sagnella 16:20, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, created to promote site. Vanity.-Jersey Devil 16:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as self promotion - [[Image:Union flag 1606 (Kings Colors).svg|20px]] • | ĐÜ§§§Ť | •  T 17:04, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete because:

1. RS Community is simply Zybez's forum. 2. Fansites don't get their own articles. It would be a different story if there was an article called RuneScape Fansites (which won't be created by me because J.J.Sagnella and friends would pounce on me) 3. This article has no content whatsoever. Dtm142 15:23, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Not really notable, and it's a fansite. —  Indi  [ talk ] 16:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This article can't even be expanded, let alone that it holds no prevelant information now. --Driken 19:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.