Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runway Magazine (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:31, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Runway Magazine
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

For much the same reasons that this article was nominated previously - a non-notable magazine with no significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. There are a number of sources listed on the page but nothing that constitutes significant coverage in reliable sources. The magazine was a "new publication" in January 2010 according to the editor, Nole Marin, and Google searches for the period from the beginning of 2009 do not throw up significant coverage in reliable sources to meet the inclusion criteria in WP:GNG. The article has been previously speedy deleted as a recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion but as this version has been up since August, I have brought it here. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The circumstances of this have not changed at all. Completely sourced by the magazine itself and puff-pieces about the magazine, and certainly not improved at all from the first iteration. As the consensus of the first AfD was completely ignored, it's time to ask for a salt on this title.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.