Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupan Deol Bajaj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As an article about the case.  Sandstein  20:43, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Rupan Deol Bajaj

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Though a subject matter of a significant and landmark Supreme Court of India case, can't assert any other notability for the subject matter. Uncletomwood (talk) 11:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:36, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:36, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Moved to keep. Selective merge to Kanwar Pal Singh Gill, whose #1996 conviction for sexual harassment duplicates most of the encyclopedic material. The paragraph in Bajaj's article about the Padma Shri award is the only meaningful new info, and it should go to that section or to Kanwar Pal Singh Gill. I've removed information about her son's booking on a murder charge, which did not result in a conviction, per WP:BLPCRIME. FourViolas (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Agree with FourViolas. Selective Merge. Uncletomwood (talk) 15:22, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Rename to Rupan Deol Bajaj case - see google search results - and google book [ resutls. This would be similar in line with [[Ruchika Girhotra case]], Category:Violence against women in India I think rename would be proper as most people search by Rupen Deol Bajaj case - Jethwarp (talk) 04:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment - have moved page to Rupan Deol Bajaj case - editing and further improving contents and references. Jethwarp (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:38, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per 's efforts. GNG is satisfied with a half-dozen targeted RS, and their verifiable encyclopedic material (mostly still not in the article) well exceeds what WP:BLP would allow to be kept at the defendant's article, with pro- and anti-Gill lobbying, Bajaj's later calls for medal-stripping, and the Ruchika Girhotra case connection. FourViolas (talk) 04:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per renamed article,(sorry forgot to vote earlier). Jethwarp (talk) 05:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.