Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupert Cawthorne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 19:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Rupert Cawthorne

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No sources, not a notable footballer LeftiePete (talk) 21:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 3.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 22:03, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  22:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - meets WP:NFOOTY; also here is one source  Spiderone  22:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per SKCRIT 2 or 3 - I have serious concerns about the conduct of the nominator and the nomination is clearly erroneous that I don't believe the nominator has even read the article, let alone undertaken WP:BEFORE. There are references in the article and they clearly show that this player is notable per WP:NFOOTBALL (professional with multiple appearances) - the article simply needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 22:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete is basically harassing and stalking me. Anyway, the footballer has hardly any notability.--LeftiePete (talk) 01:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Struck !vote as that counts as double voting., casting aspersions is something to be cautious about. If you are positive you have a case, then please take it to WP:ANI. This is not the venue. -- The SandDoctor Talk 06:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Having completed a WP:BEFORE search, the sources confirm that the subject meets the spirit of WP:GNG and Wikipedia itself. Having the article here is an improvement of Wikipedia and adheres to the five pillars that form the foundation of the project. --Tsistunagiska (talk) 19:53, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes NFOOTY due to international league appearances. Eagleash (talk) 20:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes NFOOTY and probably GNG, though my searches of newspapers of the period were a bit sparse. SportingFlyer  T · C  11:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * One of the best WP:HEYs I think I've ever seen. Easy keep. SportingFlyer  T · C  15:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.