Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupert The Riley (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Without any references, nothing verifiable could be merged. ✗ plicit  12:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Rupert The Riley (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable as an individual song. wizzito &#124; say hello!  12:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. wizzito  &#124; say hello!  12:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. wizzito  &#124; say hello!  12:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete as either a non notable song, or a hoax. -- Asartea   Talk  &#124;  Contribs  12:19, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * User:Asartea, it is real, just a demo, though. https://bowiesongs.wordpress.com/2010/02/23/rupert-the-riley/ wizzito &#124; say hello!  12:25, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * , thanks for finding that, amended -- Asartea   Talk  &#124;  Contribs  12:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Zero in-depth coverage, passes neither WP:GNG or WP:NSONG.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - The song might serve as geek trivia for Bowieheads, but as an unreleased demo with no reliable notice it does not qualify for an article here. (Someone please send the article's creator a tutorial on how to capitalize words.) ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:38, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge useful content into David Bowie, and Delete the rest. Demos are not automatically notable, and there's no evidence to support that claim that this one is. RomanSpa (talk) 10:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Selective Merge to David Bowie. Fails WP:NSONG per Doomsdayer's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 03:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per doomsdayer520. Oppose merge as this is trivial non-encyclopedic WP:Fancruft, and not seeing any value to a redirect.4meter4 (talk) 02:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.