Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rural Action


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 23:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Rural Action

 * — (View AfD)

Nothing notable here Akihabara 08:47, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be a well-established grassroots group that regularly recieves grant funding from multiple sources. I have Wikified the page, added external links (including at least two that constitute independent sources, I believe - There are likely more, this is a rush job), noted two state-level awards recieved by the group and categorized this article. Needs to be expanded, not deleted. -- Antepenultimate 16:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree. They exist. The article is more 'up to wiki standards'. Wiki's not paper. It should stay as long as its factual and NPOV. Which it is. --Xiahou 00:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Factual and NPOV do not = notable. I have no opinion here, but just saying.  The point of the nomination is that the user felt it was non-notable.  That it is factual does not address that point.--Dmz5 01:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. If we want to get specific, this subject easily passes WP:N by being dicussed by multiple, non-trivial third-party sources. -- Antepenultimate 01:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Just needs a better description--the article is too modest. DGG


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.