Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rural Bank of Marayo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Closing early per WP:SNOW Mark Arsten (talk) 07:10, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Rural Bank of Marayo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. Nothing has been done to improve the article since prodding. Raykyogrou0 ( Talk ) 10:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy close. WP:COMPANY states that "Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion." It appears this was not met, if that has been done, they a 2nd nomination may be pursued. – H T  D  12:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What makes you think I didn't? What if I didn't actually find anything which could establish its notability? Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 11:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. As per above and also the bank seems to be notable in other sources too. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 15:42, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Which sources art thou talkin' 'bout? Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 11:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Close/Keep AFD isn't used as a clean up, Also per HTD. - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  18:52, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It's not cleanup. Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 11:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. The bank is notable, in particular since it was declared the Philippines' best countryside financial institution in 2009: see this and this. --Sky Harbor (talk) 09:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * How many countryside financial institutions does the country have exactly? It doesn't really seem like a significant award. (If they were notable awards, Wikipedia would have articles on them) Seems like the source(s) don't describe the subject with in-depth coverage.  Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 15:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. The comments saying "Speedy keep" or "close" don't have actual speedy keep criterion.  Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 15:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Close/Keep - the rationale "Nothing has been done to improve the article since prodding", and the speed and lack of actual article edits on these 20 bank articles indicates that the nominator does not understand that Prod and AFD are not to be used to coerce other editors to improve articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you have any actual arguments which would prove this bank's notability or are you just commenting on all afd's I started for the heck of it? What you don't seem to understand and what I've repeated endlessly is that I did not want the article to be improved, but rather deleted since there was nothing to improve.  Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 06:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.