Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rural Landscaping And Its Tools


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:50, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Rural Landscaping And Its Tools

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A book is a book. There is no indication that this book is notable. References given here are to different versions of the book. A loose necktie (talk) 10:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable book, doesn't satisfy WP:NB. Hughesdarren (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Major copyvio from here -- S Philbrick (Talk)  13:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 01:05, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - references aren't independent, and a Google search doesn't seem to turn up anything else at all. Gazamp (talk) 02:43, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:NB.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.