Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rural marketing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  04:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Rural marketing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I tried to source, and I failed. 400 Lux (talk) 03:18, 10 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: Seems to just be a violation of WP:NOTAD turned into something that reads more like a vague encyclopedia article. Even if we could find a legitimate source, I'd say transwiki to Wiktionary at best. Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 05:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:21, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:21, 10 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: Concept appears to be at least discussed in India, but I agree this page is WP:NOTAD, to include previous contributors spamming user talk pages about a magazine about rural marketing. If the topic is notable in India and someone finds reliable sources they can always start over. C 1776 M Talk 23:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a clear and concise topic enough to have an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:12, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete -- albeit regretably. While this could be a good topic, this mess is not an article but rather, spam.  For example, political marketing is different in urban versus rural markets (heavy TV ad rotation versus mailers and free giveaways like sponges with candidates' names).  I'd be willing to userfy this if requested on the record. Bearian (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.