Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rush Gaming Universe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Rush Gaming Universe

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Company doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP - coverage mostly consists of WP:ROUTINE announcements about investment funding. MrsSnoozyTurtle 04:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games, Websites,  and India. AllyD (talk) 07:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, No WP:SIGCOV anywhere. Any "coverage" is either routine announcements of blatant advertisement. Yet another piece on the top of the cryptospam pile. Merko (talk) 21:08, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Appears to fail WP:GNG, only the article in Business Line seems to be reliable, independent, and significant . The BI article is significant but potentially unreliable, and nothing else seems to contain significant coverage. Falls far below the coverage I'd expect for a notable business in the internet era.  Dylnuge  (Talk • Edits) 04:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.