Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rush Hour 4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete a1, no verifiable content beyond one joke that the director made, rest is just "this movie might be made." NawlinWiki 02:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Rush Hour 4

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Proper third party references are required about upcoming releases. "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." I had PRODded the article, but a reply on the discussion page makes it obvious that the deletion is not uncontested, so I initiated this AfD. Moonriddengirl 01:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Just like the nominator said: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. •Malinaccier•  T / C  02:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I must protest. There's no harm in keeping the article as a "possibility." There's no reason to take it down, whatsoever. Leave it up as a possibility, and it will only prove support for the possible sequel.. Malinaccier, what's your objection to leaving it as a possibility? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zliljoemz (talk • contribs) 14 August 2007
 * Comment: •Malinaccier• is, as I am, referring to the section of What Wikipedia is not called Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. It is official Wikipedia policy that upcoming releases must be verified with reputable third party sources and certain to take place to merit articles in the encyclopedia. --Moonriddengirl 02:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

DO NOT DELETE DO NOT DELETE DO NOT DELETE Wikipedia has too many rules, what's the point? We're not talking about an article for WMD's, we're talking about RUSH HOUR 4 people. Take off your nerdy-outer coatings, and get real!! You all obviously have too much time on your hand to nit-pick articles like you do. Only reason I'm fighting for it, is because I, as many others, love RUSH HOUR. deal with it. this discussion is over If you're gonna' keep it, keep it, if you're gonna' delete it because of your up-tight rules, DO IT already. nobody's stopping you.
 * Delete per Malinaccier. I am sure neither I nor Malinaccier have any personal objection to keeping the article as a possibility, but Wikipedia policy dictates that this article must go. M1ss1ontomars2k4 02:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Oysterguitarist 02:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Wikipedia is operated on the basis of notable facts verified by reliable sources, not speculation as this article clearly is. When and if a formal announcement of RH4 is made, a cast is confirmed, and pre-production begins, then we can talk about creating an article for this. Rackabello 02:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete No context, nonsense, and crystalballery. We seriously need and  tags :-D . Rackabello 02:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.