Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russ Hudson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Russ Hudson

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The notability here is questionable. WP:GNG and WP:BIO seem to militate generally against considering him to be adequately covered by reliable secondary sources. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of the sources are suspect, although Newsweed, tee hee. I don't see notability. Oaktree b (talk) 00:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed that the sources are not necessarily reliable, Are his books at all biographical? Otherwise, no notability Uncanniey (talk) 01:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The Vice News sources seem to be WP:ROUTINE and WP:NOTNEWS, while many of the other sources seem to be WP:ROUTINE and WP:PRIMARY and do not themselves establish notability of the subject.— Mythdon ( talk  •  contribs ) 01:48, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:SIGCOV. He is covered by the Boulder Weekly, Vice News, and many others that were not cited in the article. Hudson also created the Marijuana Games. Sendero99 (talk) 06:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * People cannot read your mind. Please cite these uncited sources and tell everyone else what they are.  Presumably you are excluding the Vice articles that are cited on the (correct) grounds that the first is an interview in the first person and thus autobiography and the second is by the subject rather than about the subject.  Uncle G (talk) 07:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors,  and Massachusetts.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Having reviewed the sources listed they do not appear to constitute sig-cov and hence notability is not established, warranting deletion - Such-change47 (talk) 08:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.