Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell (locomotive)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep, nomination withdrawn with consensus for keeping. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Russell (locomotive)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The page is about a single locomotive, and does not pass standards for notability. - mattbuck 02:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC) Withdraw nomination due to added refs and stuff, didn't think this one through, my bad. - mattbuck 02:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I've added three references to published sources discussing Russell, and I have a slew more which I will add. The three references should be enough on their own, I know of at least half a dozen more. This is an easily verifiable subject. The article would bear some improvements though. Gwernol 02:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * KEEP* Wikipedia is a project dedicated to building an extensive publicaly editable encyclopedia. Just because its one train does not mean its subject for deletion, using this logic, all biographical articles are subject for deletion, as they are specific to one entity. Jeffreh172 (talk) 02:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.