Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Brand's Ponderland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. (Non admin closure). Qst (talk) 16:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Russell Brand&

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced one-line article, little context, and no reliable third party soucres showing us notability. Carlossuarez46 22:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - I tend to think that programs aired for a national audience are inherently notable. I've fleshed out the article a bit - enough to where a reader can actually tell what s/he's reading about.  --Hyperbole 23:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to pass WP:N. See the AfDs for House Auction and The KNTV Show (both of which I created the articles for and were kept).-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 23:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep is on one of the only five terrestrial channels in the UK, and is a notable departure for russell as it's more of his own stand up comedy rather than just presenting a show.  strong mention in the guardian,  review in 'time out', paragraph in the telegraph    review by someone else at channel 4, now I know the Sun is not RS for gossip, but for discussion/review I think it contributes a bit  a very long article in the New Statesman lol  happy now?:)  Might not seem like it to those in the US, but that means the show's been mentioned in most of the main papers in the UK, and discussed at length.Merkinsmum 00:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If you're going to research all those references, it really wouldn't hurt to put them in the article :) --Hyperbole 01:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, please do so or let me know and I'll do it. Thanks for digging these up.-- A. B. (talk) 03:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * OK -- here's the list; I added it to the article:
 * -- A. B. (talk) 13:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * -- A. B. (talk) 13:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * -- A. B. (talk) 13:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * -- A. B. (talk) 13:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * -- A. B. (talk) 13:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * -- A. B. (talk) 13:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep per Merkinsmum's good reference-checking. -- A. B. (talk) 03:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Definitly deserves keeping as above.Alberon 10:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletions.   — A. B. (talk) 13:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks to A.B. for doing the work lol.:)Merkinsmum 19:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep: broadcast on a major TV channel, performer is notable, plenty of press coverage. -- Karada 21:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.