Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russia–San Marino relations (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. czar ⨹   21:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Russia–San Marino relations
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Many binary international relations are notable, but this is a mere notice of the establishment of relations between an micro-nation and a major country with whom it has no substantial connection. Neither has a resident ambassador or even consulate with the other,  DGG ( talk ) 08:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  11:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Agree with deletion. To keep the article it would need things like: substantial trade relationship, important migratory movements from one country to the other, wars, political clashes that influenced substantially their relationship, etc.
 * I google translated the 10th anniversary celebration of the establishment of relationships and it only contains fluffy filler. An honorary consulate is not a professional diplomat and it's not proof of solid relationships.
 * Another problem. San Marino exists since 300, and has official existence since 1600. And it didn't any relationship with Russia until 1993?? It looks like Russia and San Marino never had any meaningful interaction. Too far away from each other, and San Marino was too small. --Enric Naval (talk) 12:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 14 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - nothing notable about this bilateral relationship, certainly nothing to suggest this relationships has received coverage in enough reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 03:23, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * delete there is nothing and no coverage of this relationship except diplomatic recognition. LibStar (talk) 08:58, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.