Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian Union of Engineers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus view was that the sources provided by User:Green Cardamom demonstrate notability. Cerebellum (talk) 14:32, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Russian Union of Engineers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, advertising The Banner talk 10:38, 22 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The article has been corrected in if corresponding to the requirements. Please remove it from the list of articles for deletion--RomankevichLS (talk) 11:48, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * You need to do a Google news search in Russian to see what coverage they have gotten, and link to at least two newspapers or magazines that have talked about them.  D r e a m Focus  14:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:54, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:54, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:55, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:58, 22 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NGO. A national (international?) organization of which the reports and activities of RUE are widely reported in the Russian press. Some examples: -- Green Cardamom (talk) 17:37, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 9 links that show their activities and support for the government but none of them is about the RUE. The Banner talk 18:37, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Well actually these articles are about RUE's activities as an organization, just as book reviews are about the activities of an author are notable, or anything about what someone or something does is notable. A detailed biographical piece would be nice but it's not required to meet notability. These sources are not by RUE if that is what you mean (the "by" vs "about" debate), they are independent sources. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 17:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Sources found that show they make headlines, and the news media considers them notable, dedicating entire articles to whatever expert opinion they gave on something.  D r e a m Focus  19:03, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The Russian Union of Engineers continues traditions of russian engineering communities of the twentieth century, however, it is a young society and hasn't received wide publicity in the media, especially abroad. In comparison with the other articles on Wikipedia, this article has a great value especially for Russia and for those people who will cooperate with Russia in the field of technology and investment. Kind regards and thanks to  D r e a m Focus  for information and links.--RomankevichLS (talk) 16:41, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.